<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Customs &amp; International Trade Law Blog</provider_name><provider_url>https://customsandinternationaltradelaw.com</provider_url><author_name>Jennifer Diaz</author_name><author_url>https://customsandinternationaltradelaw.com/author/jdiaz/</author_url><title>TOP 5 Strategies to Mitigate the Impact of Tariffs | Customs &amp; International Trade Law Blog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://customsandinternationaltradelaw.com/2019/08/26/top-5-strategies-mitigate-impact-tariffs/"&gt;TOP 5 Strategies to Mitigate the Impact of Tariffs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(c,d){"use strict";var e=!1,n=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},!c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;s.length;o++)if(r=s[o],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=d.createElement("a"),i=d.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,i.host===a.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=d.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),s=0;s&lt;i.length;s++){if(!(e=i[s]).getAttribute("data-secret"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t);if(r||a)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://customsandinternationaltradelaw.com/2019/08/26/top-5-strategies-mitigate-impact-tariffs/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;TOP 5 Strategies to Mitigate the Impact of Tariffs&#x201D; &#x2014; Customs &amp; International Trade Law Blog" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><description>Many importers, exporters, and international businesses alike may be unaware that avenues exist to ensure that their products remain unabated by protectionist trade policies (think China tariffs). This blog provides an easy reference overview of five&#xA0;(5) proven and legitimate options for duty-saving opportunities. We recommend&#xA0;U.S. importers, exporters, and manufacturers to consider these five&#xA0;(5) options as they apply to all products from virtually any country subjected to&#xA0;a tariff, including Section 201 tariffs for solar systems, Section 232&#xA0;tariffs for aluminum and steel, and the infamous Section 301 Tariffs in place for Chinese originating goods and violations of trade agreements, as well as&#xA0;acts, policies or practices that are unjustifiable,&#xA0; unreasonable, or discriminatory and that burden or restrict U.S. commerce.</description><thumbnail_url>https://customsandinternationaltradelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/download-1.jpg</thumbnail_url></oembed>
