Tag

China Trade War

BISChinaChina Trade WarCubaCubacubaExportFCPAFCPAFreight ForwardingGOLDMANInternational TradeIRANOFAC

Building a Strong Export Compliance Plan

posted by Jennifer Diaz February 23, 2021 0 comments

Co-Authored by Sharath Patil

Exporting is a Privilege, Not a Right

Over 95% of the world’s consumers are outside of the United States. Opportunities abound for U.S. companies that export. However, exporting is a privilege and not a right. U.S. exporters have an important responsibility to adhere to U.S. export control laws, including the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”), the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) sanctions laws, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). Violations of export control laws carry hefty civil and criminal penalties. Exporters can pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in penalties, lose export privileges, and even be imprisoned for violations of U.S. export control laws.

Continue Reading

Best PracticesCBPChinaChina Trade WarCustoms ExpertEnforcementForced LaborInternational BusinessInternational LawInternational TradeWRO

U.S. Customs Targets Use of Forced Labor

posted by Jennifer Diaz January 21, 2021 0 comments

Bloomgberg LawDiaz Trade Law’s President, Jennifer Diaz,  Associate Attorney, Denise Calle, and supporting Law Clerk, Zachary Kaufman, are enthusiastic to announce Bloomberg Law published another one of our articles, “U.S. Customs Targets Use of Forced Labor”! Below is the article reproduced with permission for your reading pleasure. We’d love to hear your feedback!

You can read the article here (where you’ll have the ability to access all of the great hyperlinks), please note you cannot click on the hyperlinks below.

We’d love to hear your feedback!

Continue Reading

301 INVESTIGATIONSbrokersCBPChinaChina Trade WarCOVID-19Customs BrokerCustoms BrokersCustoms ExpertEnforcementExportFRNHTSImportInternational BusinessInternational LawInternational TradeInvestigationIPRIPR, Trademarks and LogosSupply ChainTrade WarU.S.CustomsUSTR

USTR Announces China 301 Tariff Exclusion Extensions for COVID-Related Products

posted by Jennifer Diaz December 30, 2020 1 Comment

On December 29, 2020, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) announced long-awaited extensions to a limited set of previously granted exclusions (for COVID-related products), that were set to expire on December 31, 2020. Meanwhile, importers across non-COVID industries are continuing to await guidance on their tariff exclusion extensions that are set to expire on December 31, 2020.

Continue Reading

Best PracticesChinaChina Trade WarCustoms ExpertEnforcementExportImportInternational LawInternational TradeInternational TravelUSSF

New National Space Policy Drives American Leadership in Space Commerce

posted by Jennifer Diaz December 29, 2020 0 comments

Co-Authored by Sharath Patil

National Space Policy Unveiled

On December 9, 2020, the White House released the National Space Policy of the United States of America. Among other objectives, the policy seeks to drive U.S. leadership in space commerce by encouraging the cultivation of U.S. industrial capacity in space innovation.

 

Continue Reading

Best PracticesChinaChina Trade WarCustoms BrokersCustoms ExpertElection 2020EnforcementEventsExportForced LaborImportImport AlertInternational BusinessInternational LawInternational TradeU.S.Customs

Catch Up on Diaz Trade Law’s Top Blogs From 2020!

posted by Jennifer Diaz December 23, 2020 0 comments

 

We want to make sure you stay up to date with the hottest trade blogs from 2020. Below is a summary of what you missed by category. Enjoy!

 

Continue Reading

Best PracticesChinaChina Trade WarCustoms ExpertEnforcementExportImportInternational LawInternational TradeTPPTrade WarU.S.CustomsUSTR

Joe Biden & Trade – What Can Industry Expect from the New Administration?

posted by Jennifer Diaz December 7, 2020 0 comments

Co-Authored by Sharath Patil

Trump’s Trade Legacy

To fully understand the Biden administration’s trade priorities, it’s essential to understand Trump’s U.S. trade actions and the trade environment Biden will inherit. Trump made trade policy a center-stage issue. The administration enacted policies that counter several decades of neoliberal trade policies. The administration also questioned fundamental tenets of the global trading system and the function and purpose of the World Trade Organization. Furthermore, Trump followed through on many trade-related campaign promises by utilizing an array of tools.

Continue Reading

Best PracticesBISChinaChina Trade WarCustoms ExpertEnforcementExportImportImport AlertInternational LawInternational TradeInternational TravelTrade WarU.S.Customs

BIS Expands Export Restrictions Targeting China’s Largest Chipmaker

posted by Jennifer Diaz October 27, 2020 2 Comments

Co-Authored by Sharath Patil

Last week, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry & Security (“BIS”) informed some U.S. semiconductor manufacturers via a confidential letter that they would require export licenses before exporting certain products to China’s largest semiconductor manufacturer, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (“SMIC”). Although the letter is not available for public view, a September 28, 2020 Wall Street Journal article that broke the story said that the Commerce Department was concerned about high risks of diversion to a military end use. This additional export license requirement is part of a broader pattern of increased export restrictions, particularly to China.

Continue Reading

CBPChinaChina Trade WarEnforcementExportHTSImportInternational BusinessInternational LawInternational TradeInvestigationIPRIPR, Trademarks and LogosSupply ChainTrade WarU.S.CustomsUSTR

LIST 3 Exclusion Updates

posted by Jennifer Diaz October 26, 2020 0 comments

On June 24, 2019, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) provided the public with an exclusion process for items included subjected to Section 301 Tariffs. Specifically, the exclusions related to products included on List 3, which went into effect on September 24, 2018.

Originally, List 3 imposed 10 percent ad valorem duties on 5,757 full and partial subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) and had an annual trade value of $200 Billion. Months later, in May 2019, the 10 percent ad valorem duties were increased to 25 percent. Continue Reading

CBPChinaChina Trade WarCustoms ExpertEnforcementExportHTSImportInternational BusinessInternational LawInternational TradeInvestigationIPRSupply ChainTrade WarUSMCA

List 4 Exclusion Update

posted by Jennifer Diaz October 23, 2020 0 comments

On  June 26, July 17, and August 11, 2020, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) requested the public to submit comments regarding potential product exclusion extensions for items subject to Section 301 Tariffs. This comment period specifically applied to products that were included on List 4.

When the list was announced on August 20, 2019, it imposed a 10 percent ad valorem on 3,805 full and partial subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), with an annual trade value of approximately $300 billion. Then, on August 30, 2019, USTR increased the rate of the additional duty announced in the August 20 notice from 10 to 15 percent. Finally, on January 22, 2020, USTR determined to reduce the rate from 15 to 7.5 percent. Continue Reading

ChinaChina Trade WarCustoms ExpertEnforcementExportImportInternational BusinessInternational LawInternational TradeList 4ATrade WarU.S.Customs

Diaz Trade Law Now Filing List 4A Complaints – Join Section 301 Refund Lawsuit Now to Demand Refunds

posted by Jennifer Diaz October 22, 2020 1 Comment

301 Lawsuit Background

In mid-September, a coalition of importers filed a Court challenge to the USTR’s imposition of Section 301 duties on certain imports from China under Lists 3 and 4.  These duties were imposed as part of a process purportedly intended to address intellectual property abuses by China.  Specifically, this coalition has claimed that these duties were imposed contrary to law and ignored the statutory deadlines in Section 301.  Further, the coalition has argued that these duties were not imposed in response to the intellectual property violations alleged in the initiation notice, but rather were filed in response to the retaliatory tariffs enacted by China.  Accordingly, the coalition argues, such tariffs were void from the initial imposition.

Continue Reading