New AD/CVD Case Filed: High Purity Dissolving Pulp from Brazil and Norway

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed on high purity dissolving pulp from Brazil and Norway. The allegation is that imports from Brazil and Norway are unfairly subsidized and are being dumped.  

Full list of exporters here. 

Full list of importers here.   

Background on AD/CVD Investigations  

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by these investigations is high purity dissolving pulp.  

The products subject to the investigations are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 4702.00.0020 and 4702.00.0040.  

Full scope here.

Next Steps 

The Commerce Department will determine whether to initiate the investigations within 20 days. The USITC will reach a preliminary determination of material injury or threat of material […]

By |2025-08-13T13:14:58-04:00August 13, 2025|AD/CVD, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on New AD/CVD Case Filed: High Purity Dissolving Pulp from Brazil and Norway

AD/CVD News: New Case Filed Against Freight Rail Couplers From the Czech Republic and India

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against certain freight rail couplers and parts from the Czech Republic and India. The allegation is that imports from Czech Republic and India are unfairly subsidized and being dumped.  

Full list of exporters here. 

Full list of importers here.  

Background on AD/CVD Investigations 

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by these investigations is freight railcar couplers (also known as “fits” or “assemblies”) and parts thereof.  

The products subject to the investigations are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 8607.30.1000, 8607.30.1010, 8607.30.1050, 8607.30.1090, 7326.90.8688, 8606.10.0000, 8606.30.1000, 8606.91.0000, 8606.92.0000, 8606.99.0130, 8606.99.0160, 9803.00.50, and 7325.99.5000.  

Full scope here.

Next Steps 

The Commerce Department will determine whether […]

By |2025-07-23T18:35:45-04:00July 23, 2025|AD/CVD, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on AD/CVD News: New Case Filed Against Freight Rail Couplers From the Czech Republic and India

AD/CVD News: New Case Filed Against Oleoresin Paprika from India

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against Oleoresin Paprika imported from India. The allegation is that imports from India are unfairly subsidized and being dumped.  

Full list of exporters here. 

Full list of importers here.  

Background on AD/CVD Investigations 

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by these investigations is coloring additive oleoresin paprika.  

 The products subject to the investigations are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 3203.00.8000 and 3301.90.1010. Subject merchandise may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 1301.90.9190, 1302.19.9140, and 3205.00.0500. 

By |2025-06-25T14:19:02-04:00June 25, 2025|U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on AD/CVD News: New Case Filed Against Oleoresin Paprika from India

New AD/CVD Case Filed Against L-lysine from the People’s Republic of China

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against “L-lysine” imported from China. The L-lysine covered by this petition is animal feed grade L-lysine. The allegation is that imports from China are both unfairly subsidized and are being dumped (sold below cost).   

Full list of exporters here. 

Full list of importers here.  

Background on AD/CVD Investigations 

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The merchandise covered by these investigations is animal feed grade L-lysine. Lysine is an essential amino acid added to animal feed that is used in biosynthesis of proteins. 

The products subject to the investigations are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under statistical reporting number 2922.41.0090. 

Full scope here. 

U.S. Imports of Subject […]

By |2025-06-02T15:40:09-04:00June 2, 2025|AD/CVD, China, Countries, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on New AD/CVD Case Filed Against L-lysine from the People’s Republic of China

AD/CVD News: Initiation of AD/CVD Investigations on Silicon Metal from Angola, Australia, Laos, Norway, and Thailand 

On April 24, 2025, Ferroglobe USA, Inc. and Mississippi Silicon LLC (collectively, “Petitioners”) filed an antidumping and countervailing duties petition on ferrosilicon from Angola, Australia, Laos, Norway, and Thailand.

Background on AD/CVD Investigations

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent.

Scope of the Investigation

The merchandise covered is all forms and sizes of silicon metal, including silicon metal powder. Silicon metal contains at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon, and less than 4.00 percent iron, by actual weight. Semiconductor grade silicon (merchandise containing at least 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight and classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 2804.61.0000) is excluded from the scope of this investigation.  

Silicon metal is currently classifiable under subheadings 2804.69.1000 and 2804.69.5000 of the HTSUS. While the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope remains dispositive. 

Next Steps

On May 21, 2025, the U.S. Department […]

By |2025-05-29T07:59:15-04:00May 29, 2025|AD/CVD, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on AD/CVD News: Initiation of AD/CVD Investigations on Silicon Metal from Angola, Australia, Laos, Norway, and Thailand 

New AD/CVD Case Filed Against Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes from Vietnam and China

A new antidumping and countervailing duty action has been filed against “Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes” imported from Vietnam and China. These boxes are colloquially know as Vegetable or Seafood Boxes and are used to pack and ship articles such as produce. The allegation is that imports from China are both unfairly subsidized and are being dumped (sold below cost) while imports from Vietnam are alleged to being dumped (sold for below cost).

Full list of exporters here.

Background on AD/CVD Investigations

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. The domestic industry initiating the investigation is known as the petitioner while the foreign industry participating in the investigation is known as the respondent.

Scope of the Investigation

The merchandise covered by these investigations is Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes (“PCBs”). PCBs are boxes, totes, or other containers made of corrugated polypropylene sheets, also known as polypropylene hollow core sheets, polypropylene twin wall sheets, or multi wall sheets.

The […]

By |2025-03-20T23:14:28-04:00March 20, 2025|AD/CVD, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on New AD/CVD Case Filed Against Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes from Vietnam and China

Case Update: Investigation of Aluminum Extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam

On November 30, 2024, we published the below article on the ITC’s AD/CVD investigation of aluminum extrusions. Since then, there have been two significant updates in the case:

  1. The parties who petitioned for the antidumping and countervailing duties to be applied have filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of International Trade. The case is expected to take at least a year and does not create any obligation to continue to deposit AD/CVD duties.
  2. CBP has received the official termination instructions to no longer collect AD/CVD duties for these cases and to refund any AD/CVD duties that an importer may have previously made.

Original article:

On November 22, 2024, the International Trade Commission (ITC) published in the Federal Register its negative final determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) investigation of aluminum extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam.

The Commission found that an industry in the United States is not materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of these imports.

Investigation Background

The Commission instituted these investigations effective October 4, 2023, following receipt of petitions filed by the U.S. Aluminum Extruders Coalition.

The Department of Commerce made preliminary determinations that imports of aluminum extrusions from China, Indonesia, Mexico, and Turkey were subsidized and that imports of aluminum extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam were sold at less than fair value.

Following this preliminary determination, […]

By |2024-12-10T09:18:06-05:00December 10, 2024|AD/CVD, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on Case Update: Investigation of Aluminum Extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam

ITC Terminates AD/CVD Investigation of Aluminum Extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam

On November 22, 2024, the International Trade Commission (ITC) published in the Federal Register its negative final determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) investigation of aluminum extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam.

The Commission found that an industry in the United States is not materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of these imports.

Investigation Background

The Commission instituted these investigations effective October 4, 2023, following receipt of petitions filed by the U.S. Aluminum Extruders Coalition.

The Department of Commerce made preliminary determinations that imports of aluminum extrusions from China, Indonesia, Mexico, and Turkey were subsidized and that imports of aluminum extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam were sold at less than fair value.

Following this preliminary determination, the final phase of the investigations was scheduled by the Commission. The Commission conducted its hearing on October 1, 2024 where all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate.

Immediate Impact

CBP has been instructed to discontinue the suspension of liquidation of entries of merchandise which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 11, 2024. These entries should be liquidated without regard to countervailing duties. Further, all estimated countervailing duties deposited on entries of the subject merchandise will be refunded.

If you have questions about how this determination impacts your business, get in touch with us at 305-456-3830 or […]

By |2024-11-30T10:02:31-05:00November 30, 2024|AD/CVD, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC)|Comments Off on ITC Terminates AD/CVD Investigation of Aluminum Extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam

Trade News: New AD/CVD Petition Filed Against Certain Corrosion Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam

A group of steel companies and stakeholders filed a petition for the imposition of antidumping and countervailing (AD/CVD) duties on the imports of certain corrosion resistant steel products (“CORE”) from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam. 

Petitioners include: Steel Dynamics, Inc.; Nucor Corporation; United States Steel Corporation; Wheeling-Nippon Steel, Inc.; and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union.

Petitioners allege that these unfairly traded imports have materially injured the U.S. domestic industry and threaten to cause further material injury if remedial action is not taken

Full list of exporters. Full list of importers.

Background on AD/CVD Investigations

Antidumping duty (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations are brought jointly by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC”) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). AD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports of particular goods from specific countries being sold at less than a fair value. Meanwhile, CVD investigations are triggered when a domestic industry alleges that it has been injured by competing imports that are being unfairly subsidized by their governments. 

Scope of the Investigation

This investigation pertains to certain corrosion resistant steel products. The products covered include certain flat-rolled steel products, either clad, […]

By |2024-09-06T11:31:03-04:00September 6, 2024|AD/CVD, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on Trade News: New AD/CVD Petition Filed Against Certain Corrosion Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam

ICYMI: Court of International Trade Tells Commerce to Verify Exporter’s Nonuse of China’s EBCP

The Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled in a recent opinion that it is  unreasonable for the Commerce Department not to attempt verification of an exporter’s certificates proclaiming nonuse of China’s Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP) when the exporter did not submit certificates for all its customers.

The ruling stems from an administrative review of a 2012 countervailing duty order on solar cells from China. In February 2022, Commerce initiated its Ninth Administrative Review of the order. In March 2022, the International Trade Administration (ITA) selected Risen Energy Co, a developer, manufacturer, and distributor of solar photovoltaic application products, as a mandatory respondent.

Risen reported that none of its customers used the EBCP during the period of review, and submitted non-use certificates for all but one of its U.S. customers. However, in the final results, Commerce included the Government of China’s EBCP in its calculation of Risen’s countervailing duty rate. Commerce stated that the Government of China did not provide all of the information initially requested, namely the one missing non-certificate. Therefore, Commerce concluded that Risen had failed to provide sufficient record evidence to determine non-use. Risen appealed the decision to the CIT arguing that the decision was not based on substantial evidence.

Judge Jane Restani heard the case and remanded the review of the countervailing duty order so that Commerce can attempt to verify Risen’s non-use certificates. Judge Restani stated that the conclusion that Risen failed to provide sufficient evidence based on their inability to account for a […]

By |2024-08-26T11:49:35-04:00August 26, 2024|AD/CVD, China, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)|Comments Off on ICYMI: Court of International Trade Tells Commerce to Verify Exporter’s Nonuse of China’s EBCP
Go to Top