Pre-compliance Archives | Customs & International Trade Law Blog

De Minimis, Codified: CBP Finalizes the Postal Suspension Rule — July 24 Comment Deadline

KEY TAKEAWAYS

De minimis is not new news — the $800 duty-free exemption was already suspended for all countries on August 29, 2025. What’s new is CBP’s interim final rule codifying the postal piece and creating a formal postal informal entry process.
Two key dates: the postal IFR takes effect July 24, 2026 (compliance by October 22, 2026), and public comments on the rulemaking are due July 24, 2026.
If your business ships low-value parcels by mail, the entry mechanics are now being locked into regulation. The comment window is your one chance to shape them before they harden.

De Minimis Is Over. Now CBP Is Writing the New Rules.

For years, the de minimis exemption was the quiet engine of e-commerce: shipments valued at or under $800 entered the United States free of duty and with minimal formality. That era already ended. As we covered in De Minimis No More: What It Means for Importers and Consumers, a July 30, 2025, Executive Order suspended duty-free de minimis treatment for all countries effective August 29, 2025, accelerating the repeal that the 2025 budget law had set for July 1, 2027.

So the headline is not that de minimis is ending — it ended ten months ago. The development now is regulatory: CBP is codifying how low-value shipments, particularly through the international mail channel, must be […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-06-29T09:44:34-04:00June 29, 2026|Import, Pre-compliance, Tariffs, Trade Policy, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|Comments Off

CBP Seized Your Goods at the Border: Your Options and Next Steps

For more information on this topic, register today for our upcoming webinar: ‘Goods Detained or Seized by CBP? Understand Your Options.” Register here.

Summary: When CBP seizes imported goods at the border, importers have several options — including filing a Petition, submitting an Offer in Compromise, or pursuing court action. This article explains the difference between detention and seizure, outlines the steps importers should take immediately after receiving a CBP Seizure Notice, and describes how a customs attorney can help recover seized merchandise and prevent future seizure.

Importers expect the import process to run smoothly, but when a product is not compliant with U.S. laws and regulations, CBP is authorized under 19 CFR Part 162 and 19 CFR Part 151 to detain or seize goods upon importation.

When goods arrive at a U.S. port of entry, CBP has the authority to detain a shipment if there is a question about its admissibility or compliance with U.S. laws and regulations. Detention is not the same as seizure. It is a temporary hold that gives CBP time to review the shipment and allows the importer to respond. During this window, a customs attorney can communicate directly with CBP on your behalf, provide the documentation or legal arguments needed to resolve the issue, and work to get your goods released before the situation escalates.

If you do not respond effectively, CBP may move forward with […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-06-19T11:41:20-04:00June 19, 2026|Enforcement, Import, International Trade, Pre-compliance, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|Comments Off

The CPSC eFiling Deadline is Here!

Summary: On December 18, 2024, the CPSC voted to approve a Final Rule requiring importers of regulated consumer products to electronically file Certificate of Compliance data at the time of entry. The rule takes effect July 8, 2026, for most imported consumer products. This article covers what the CPSC eFiling requirement means for importers, and the steps businesses should take now to ensure compliance before the deadline.

On July 8, 2026, the CPSC’s mandatory eFiling requirements take effect for most imported consumer products. That means importers can no longer wait to be asked for a Certificate of Compliance. These certificates must now be electronically filed in CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) at the time of entry, not after the fact.

Importers that are not compliant with the applicable effective date may experience delays in the release of their shipments and increased scrutiny by CPSC at the port of entry. For products entering from a Foreign Trade Zone, the compliance date is January 8, 2027.

CPSC’s eFiling Proposal

Since 2008, importers have been required to maintain Certificates of Compliance stating that the product they are importing meets all applicable safety standards. However, these certificates did not need to be filed at the time of import.

In June 2022, CPSC announced a Beta Pilot test with CBP for the eFiling of certificate data for regulated […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2026-06-18T15:41:02-04:00June 18, 2026|ACE, Import, Pre-compliance, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|Comments Off

Importer End-of-Year Checklist: How to Strengthen Compliance and Prepare for the Year Ahead

For U.S. importers, the end of the year is a critical moment to evaluate compliance, correct issues, and prepare for the year ahead. With tariff changes, supply chain uncertainty, and an increased focus on enforcement, importers who take a proactive approach now will start the new year strong. Here’s a practical checklist for your year-end review.

1. Review Import Data for Accuracy

Begin with a thorough audit of your import data. Confirm that HTS classifications are correct and current, declared values accurately reflect your transactions, and country-of-origin determinations are well documented. Small mistakes can lead to large penalties.

2. Reassess Tariffs and Duty Exposure

Year-end is the ideal time to evaluate whether you are paying unnecessary duties and explore your options for tariff mitigation strategies. Consider what exclusions have changed, whether tariff engineering may reduce costs, or whether sourcing strategies should be updated. Many importers discover duty-saving opportunities simply by reassessing their tariff positions annually.

3. Strengthen Forced Labor Compliance

With UFLPA enforcement intensifying, importers must confirm that supplier information, ownership structures, and supply chain documentation are up to date. Now is the time to verify traceability records, refresh internal training, and assess whether high-risk suppliers require additional review.

4. Update Written Compliance Procedures

If your compliance manual or SOPs haven’t been updated this year, they’re likely outdated. Written processes should reflect current regulations, product updates, tariff changes, and internal workflow adjustments. CBP expects importers to document their […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-12-22T09:04:16-05:00December 22, 2025|Best Practices, Import, International Trade, Pre-compliance, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|Comments Off

Jewelry Company Charged in $86M Duty Evasion Scheme

On November 17, 2025, the owner of an Indonesian jewelry company (USB Gold) and two employees were charged with taking part in a scheme to evade over $86 million in duties on jewelry imports.

The employees were arrested and charged with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and were detained. The company co-owner, who was also charged, remains in Indonesia and has not yet been arrested.

The defendants allegedly engaged in a complex scheme to import over $1.2 billion of jewelry and illegally defraud the United States out of more than $86 million in customs duties and tariffs.

The alleged scheme included two parts:

First, UBS Gold made jewelry in Indonesia and shipped it to Jordan, which had a Free Trade Agreement with the United States, before sending it to the United States. The defendants then falsely claimed that UBS Gold jewelry had been manufactured in Jordan, which avoided the duty that would otherwise apply.
Second, when the U.S. announced additional tariffs on Indonesia and Jordan earlier this year, the company began shipping scrap gold from the U.S. to Jordan, which they falsely claimed was gold jewelry that simply needed to be assembled or finished in Jordan. Instead, the defendants and co-conspirators swapped the scrap gold for UBS Gold jewelry made in Indonesia, which they then shipped from Jordan to the U.S. The […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-11-26T07:43:23-05:00November 26, 2025|Enforcement, Import, International Trade, Pre-compliance, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)|Comments Off

Act NOW to Preserve Potential Tariff Refunds

Tariff policy is changing overnight, and all indicators signal that the Trump Administration will continue to impose tariffs to achieve its trade agenda. There are several lawsuits pending that may eventually invalidate some of the Administration’s tariffs. However, importers should not sit around and wait for the dust to settle. Importers must act NOW and take proactive measures to protect their ability to seek refunds if tariffs are ultimately found to be unlawful.

IEEPA Tariffs at the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump on November 5, 2025. The case challenges whether the President has the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Administration relied heavily on IEEPA to impose new tariffs – including fentanyl tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico, and global reciprocal tariffs. Many trade lawyers are predicting that the Court will rule in favor of importers and find that IEEPA does not grant the President the authority to impose sweeping tariffs.

Potential Refunds & What Importers Should Do

Although it remains unclear how CBP will handle refunds (should SCOTUS agree with the lower courts), it is likely that once an entry is liquidated and the liquidation becomes final, CBP may not grant a refund of duties paid, regardless of SCOTUS’s outcome. It will likely be the position that CBP only has to grant refunds to those parties that have a Court […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-11-17T09:01:18-05:00November 17, 2025|International Trade, Pre-compliance, Tariffs|Comments Off

FDA Launches Real-Time Adverse Event Reporting Dashboard for Cosmetic Products

On September 12, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the launch of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard for Cosmetic Products. The system is an interactive tool designed to facilitate the public’s ability to search and find real-time adverse event data on cosmetic products. Through the tool, users can search and view reports using search terms, including the product name. Users can also download data sets and report listings. The FDA will update the tool daily to ensure it includes the most recent submissions.

The dashboard includes serious adverse event reports submitted by responsible persons for cosmetic products under requirements established by the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA), as well as voluntary adverse event reports submitted to the FDA by healthcare professionals, consumers, salon professionals, cosmetologists, and others.

This announcement follows a recent launch of real-time reporting of adverse event and medication errors data for drugs and therapeutic biologics.

In the announcement, the FDA stated these real-time reporting tools are part of the agency’s commitment to transparency and providing greater insight into the safety and regulation of the products consumers use every day.

Note: Reports in this dashboard have not been verified by the FDA, and their publication does not indicate that the FDA has concluded the product caused the adverse event.

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-09-19T09:48:33-04:00September 19, 2025|Cosmetics, Enforcement, International Trade, Pre-compliance, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)|Comments Off

ICYMI: FDA Launches Nationalized Entry Review Program (NER)

FDA recently implemented the Nationalized Entry Review Program (NER), which centralizes how the agency reviews imports nationwide. The program is effective as of August 4, 2025. Key changes include:

Coordinated National Response: Rather than each port conducting manual reviews of certain entries on its own, specialized teams now coordinate their efforts across the country to more quickly identify and stop dangerous products.
Harmonized Real-Time Alert System: If the FDA detects a high-risk product at one port, such as contaminated infant formula or counterfeit drugs, alerts are immediately shared across all ports so they can watch for the same threats.
Improved Efficiency: Built on a successful 2022 pilot, the NER program has sped up processing by 70% and increased detection of high-risk products by 36%.
Expanded Reviewer Capacity: The program allows for more FDA reviewer availability and collaboration across the national network.

The FDA’s current evaluative standards, regulatory requirements, and admissibility thresholds remain the same.

The FDA has also published a communications guide that includes general contact protocols, hot shipments handling, email formatting requirements, and FAQs.

Diaz Trade Law provides assistance with FDA pre-compliance as well as assistance in successfully navigating FDA enforcement actions. For assistance with NER requirements or other FDA matters, contact us […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-09-12T09:42:51-04:00September 12, 2025|Cosmetics, Enforcement, Food, Import, International Trade, Medical Devices, Pre-compliance, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)|Comments Off

Census Bureau Releases Final Rule Clarifying Filing Requirements for In-Transit Shipments

On August 14, 2025, The Census Bureau issued a final rule to clarify its regulations governing in-transit shipments from foreign countries through the United States that are subsequently exported to a foreign destination. The rule takes effect September 15, 2025.

Background

The Census Bureau is responsible for collecting, compiling, and publishing import and export trade statistics for the United States. As part of this responsibility, the Census collects Electronic Export Information (EEI) in concert with the export control and enforcement functions of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC).

Public Law 107-228 directed the Census to publish regulations requiring exporters to file Shippers’ Export Declarations. As a result, the bureau experienced an increase in the number of inquiries regarding in-transit movements. Accordingly, in October of 2024 the Census solicited comments on a proposed rule to clarify its regulations governing in-transit shipments. The bureau received 11 letters and emails commenting on the proposed rule.

Key Changes

In addition to making definitional, grammatical and style changes, the rule: (i) clarifies who is the USPPI; (ii) makes changes to mandatory filing requirements; (iii) makes changes to voluntary self-disclosures.

Who is the USPPI

The U.S. Principal Party in Interest (USPPI) is the person or legal entity in the United States that receives the primary benefit, […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-08-15T09:26:47-04:00August 15, 2025|EEI, Enforcement, Export, International Trade, Pre-compliance, U.S. Census Bureau|Comments Off

Five Tips for SMEs Looking to Scale Wellness Brands in the US

DTL President Jennifer Diaz was featured in Santander Navigator! Read below or on Santander here.

Pre-planning and investing in regulatory compliance measures are key to success

The US is the most lucrative wellness market in the world – and for some small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that produce supplements, the potential for growth and a bigger bottom line is difficult to ignore.

And who would blame them? The US wellness sector is valued at US$2tn and is poised to continue growing, recording an average annual growth rate of 8.3% between 2019 and 2023, according to research by the Global Wellness Institute.

In contrast, China’s market, ranked the second-largest in the world, trails at a more modest US$870bn, followed by Germany at $310bn.

However, rushing in without being fully compliant could result in products being blacklisted or seized at the border, says Jennifer Diaz, an attorney and founding partner at Miami-based Diaz Trade Law, which specializes in customs and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) laws and compliance.

Here, Diaz offers her top five tips for new brands to stay compliant and off the FDA’s blacklist.

1. Know the regulators

One of the first steps for SMEs planning to import supplements into the US is to register with the FDA, as they are considered a food product, Diaz says.

Companies also need to designate […]

By Jennifer Diaz|2025-06-17T08:40:04-04:00June 17, 2025|Best Practices, Import, Import Alert, International Business, International Trade, Labeling, Pre-compliance|Comments Off